| |
April 2008 - Volume 2, Issue
2
REVIEW ON TUBERCULOSIS
 |
|
 |
|
ABSTRACT
There is
clear evidence that worldwide tuberculosis is increasing.
It is estimated that
between 2002 and 2020, nearly one billion will be newly
infected with tuberculosis, 200 million will develop
the disease, and 35 million will die from tuberculosis.
The most profound influence
on the incidence of tuberculosis is HIV infection, particularly
in Sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV and tuberculosis form
a lethal combination, each speeding the other's progress.
HIV infection has been estimated
to account for an excess of 34% of new cases. In countries
with high burdens of both tuberculosis and HIV, the
continued increase in tuberculosis will depend upon
the level and trend of both HIV and tuberculosis infection
in the community.
Other factors contributing
to the global resurgence of tuberculosis include poverty,
overcrowding ,increased travel/immigration, breakdown
of tuberculosis control programs, multi-drug resistant
tuberculosis (MDR), and incomplete treatment.
Recently, specifically in March
2006 a paper published by Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report (Were the authors trying to "sex
up" their report) they had chosen the abbreviation
XDR tuberculosis However huge global interest was sparked
by a report at the international AIDS conference in
August, of a cluster of cases in South Africa of XDR
tuberculosis with high mortality among HIV co-infected
patients, with a Google search finding 130 000 hits.
|
 |
INTRODUCTION
What is XDR tuberculosis, and how
concerned should we be about it? (XDR refers to Extreme Drug
Resistance). As defined in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report an XDR isolate is resistant to Isoniazide and rifampicin
(i.e. the definition of multi-drug resistance), two of the
first line anti-tuberculosis drugs and resistant to at least
two to three of the six classes of the second line antimicrobials
(amino glycosides, polypeptides, fluroquinolones, thiomides,
cycloserine and para-aminosalicylic acid). However, at a WHO
meeting in Geneva on October 9-10 2006 ,the definition of
XDr tuberculosis was revised to resistance to isoniazise plus
rifampicin, to floroquinolones, and to either amino glycosides
or capreomycin (a polypeptide).
WHAT IS THE CURRENT EVIDENCE OF XDR-TB?
The MMWR paper reported
a survey of 17,690 tuberculosis isolates collected worldwide
(almost 12,000 of them were from South Korea) between 2000-2004.
3,520 (19.9%)isolates were multiple drug resistant, of which
347 (2%) were XDR. Among patients with XDR tuberculosis, those
in the USA were 64% more likely to die during treatment than
patients with the multi drug - resistant form, and those in
Latvia were 54% more likely to die or have treatment failure.
Although the MMWR study
identified XDR tuberculosis from all parts of the world, only
one isolate from Africa was XDR. However, the subsequent report
from the rural Msinga district of kwazulu Natal, South Africa,
described 536 patients with tuberculosis, of whom 221 had
a multi drug resistant form and 53 of these were XDR. 52 of
the 53 patients died, with a median survival time of just
16 days after giving a sputum sample.
Genotyping of the studies of
isolates from 46 of the 53 patients showed 39 to be genetically
similar, belonging to the Kwazulu Natal family of tuberculosis
strains. A cluster of cases of multi drug resistant tuberculosis
in Guateng, South Africa, is not at present believed to involve
the strain from Kwazulu Natal. However,
South Africa is not alone in experiencing outbreaks of XDR
tuberculosis: a recent paper in Clinical Infectious Diseases
describes two epidemiologically related clusters of cases
in Iran, and a letter in BMJ reports an outbreak in Norway
that has been going on for at least a decade.
Although the reports of clusters
of XDR tuberculosis are as yet limited, they suggest that
strains have emerged (or will emerge) in many locations and
on many occasions, a worrisome development. A further concern
is that with the ease of international travel. XDR strains
might move rapidly from their place of origin. Ever since
it has been possible to treat tuberculosis with antimicrobials,
it has been clear that drug resistance emerges as a result
of poor prescribing practices and suboptimal control programs.
Organisms exposed to just antibacterial drug, or sub-standard
doses of several drugs, – will acquire resistance by genetic
mutation, and further suboptimal exposure to additional agents
will encourage accumulation of multiple levels of resistance.
For all that the International Standards
for Tuberculosis Care (ISTC) were developed through a year
long inclusive process, guided by a 28 member steering committee.
The purpose of ISTC is to describe a widely endorsed (an up-to-date
list of endorsers can be found at http://www.stoptb.org) level
of care that all practitioners, public and private, should
seek to achieve in managing patients who have, or are suspected
of having tuberculosis. The ISTC differ from existing guidelines
in that they describe what should be done, whereas guidelines
describe how the action is to be accomplished. The ISTC are
not intended to replace neither WHO nor local guidelines
and were written to accommodate local differences in practice.
The main target audience for ISTC
is the broad group of health care professionals who provide
diagnostic and treatment services for tuberculosis outside
of government tuberculosis programs. It is anticipated the
ISTC will be used as a tool to unify approaches to tuberculosis
care between public (at least government tuberculosis control
programs) and private providers.
Another anticipated use of the ISTC
is to serve as a focus of curricula for medical, nursing,
and allied health students a well as for in-service education.
The ISTC is to apply to patients of all ages, including those
with smear-positive, smear-negative and extra pulmonary tuberculosis
caused by drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
organisms, and tuberculosis combined with HIV infection.
The basic principles of care for
people with, or suspected of having, tuberculosis are the
same worldwide: a diagnosis should be established promptly
and accurately; standardized treatment regimen of proven efficacy
should be used, together with appropriate treatment support
and supervision; the response to treatment should be monitored;
and the essential public health responsibilities must be carried
out. Prompt and accurate diagnosis and effective treatment
are not only essential for good patient care; they are also
the key elements in the public health response to tuberculosis.
Thus, all providers who undertake
evaluation and treatment of patients with tuberculosis must
recognize that as well as delivering care to an individual,
they are also assuming an important public health function
that entails a high level of responsibility to the community,
as well as to the individual patients.
STANDARDS FOR DIAGNOSIS
Standard 1
All persons with otherwise
unexplained cough lasting 2-3 weeks or more should be evaluated
for tuberculosis.
Standard 2
All patients (adults,
adolescents, and children who are capable of producing sputum)
suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis should have at
least two, and preferably three, sputum specimens obtained
for microscopic examination. When possible at least one early
specimen should be obtained.
Standard 3
For all
patients (adults, adolescents, and children) suspected for
having extra pulmonary tuberculosis, appropriate specimens
from the suspected sites of involvement should be obtained
for microscopic, and where facilities and resources are available,
for culture and histopathological examination.
Standard 4
All people with chest radiographic findings suggestive
of tuberculosis should have sputum specimens submitted for
microbiological examination.
Standard 5
The diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis
should be based on the following criteria: at least three
negative sputum smears (including at least one early morning
specimen); chest radiograph findings consistent with tuberculosis;
and lack of response to a trial of broad spectrum antimicrobial
agents .(Note: because the fluroquinolones are active against
M tuberculosis complex, and thus may cause transient improvement
in people with tuberculosis, they should be avoided). For
such patients, if facilities for culture are available, sputum
cultures should be obtained. In people with known or suspected
HIV infection the diagnostic evaluation should be expedited.
Standard 6
The diagnosis of intra-thoracic (i.e. pulmonary, pleural,
and mediastinal or hilar lymph node) tuberculosis in symptomatic
children with negative sputum smears should be based on the
finding of chest radiographic abnormalities consistent with
tuberculosis and either a history of exposure to an infectious
case or evidence of tuberculosis infection (positive tuberculin
skin test or interferon gamma release assay). For such patients,
if facilities for culture are available, sputum specimens
should be obtained (by expectoration, gastric washing, or
induced sputum) for culture.
The following are clinical features
suggestive of tuberculosis in children based on theWHO guidelines
published in 2000:
The risk of tuberculosis is increased
when there is an active case (infectious, smear positive tuberculosis)
in the same house, or when the child is malnourished, is HIV
infected, or has had measles in the past few months.
Consider tuberculosis in any child
with a history of:
- unexplained weight loss or failure
to grow normally
- unexplained fever, especially
when it continues for more than 2 weeks*chronic cough*exposure
to an adult with probable or definite pulmonary infectious
tuberculosis
On examination:
- fluid on the side of the chest
(reduced air entry, stony dullness to percussion)
- enlarged non-tender lymph nodes
or a lymph node abscess, especially in the neck
- signs of meningitis, especially
when these develop over several days and the spinal fluid
contains mostly lymphocytes and elevated protein
- abdominal swelling, with or without
palpable lumps<
- progressive swelling or deformity
in the bone or a joint, including the spine
STANDARDS FOR TREATMENT
Standard 7
Any practitioner treating
a patient for tuberculosis is assuming an important public-health
responsibility. To fulfill this responsibility the practitioner
must not only prescribe an appropriate regimen, but also be
capable of assessing the adherence of the patient to the regimen
and addressing poor adherence when it occurs. By so doing
the provider will be able to ensure adherence to the regimen
until treatment is completed.
Standard 8
All patients (including
those with HIV infection) who have not been treated previously
should receive an internationally accepted first line treatment
regimen using drugs for known bioavailability. The initial
phase should consist of 2 months of isoniazide, rifampicin,
pyrazinzmide and ethambutol. (Ethambutol may be omitted in
the initial phase of treatment for adults and children who
have negative sputum smears, do not have extensive pulmonary
tuberculosis or severe forms of extra-pulmonary disease and
who are known to be HIV negative).
The dose of anti-tuberculosis drugs
used should conform to international recommendations .Fixed
dose combinations of two (isoniazide and rifampicin), three
(isoniazide, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide), and four (isoniazide,
rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) drugs are highly
recommended, especially when medication ingestion is not observed.
| Recommended
tuberculosis treatment for people not treated previously |
| Ranking |
initial phase |
continuous
phase |
| Preferred |
isoniazide, rifampicin, pyrazinmide,
ethambutol*+ |
isoniazide, rifampicin daily
or 3 times per week |
| |
Daily or 3 times per week for
2 months |
for 4 months |
| Optional |
isoniazide, rifam picin, pyrazinmide,
ethambutol |
isoniazide, ethambutol daily,
6 months** |
| |
Daily, 2 months |
|
* Streptomycin may be substituted
for ethambutol +Ethambutol may be omitted in the initial
phase of treatment for adults and children who have negative
sputum smears, do not have extensive pulmonary tuberculosis
or sever forms of extra pulmonary diseases ,and who are known
to be HIV negative
**Associated with higher rate of
treatment failure and relapse, should generally not be used
in patients with HIV infection
| Doses of first-line anti
tuberculosis drugs in adults in children |
| Drug |
Recommended
dose in mg/kg body weight (range) |
| Daily |
Three times weekly |
| Isoniazide |
5 (4-6), maximum 300 daily |
10 |
| Rifampicin |
10 (8-12), maximum 600 daily
|
10 (8-12), maximum 600 daily |
| Pyrazinamide |
25 (20-30) |
35 (30-40) |
| Ethambutol |
children 20 (15-25)*, adults15
(15-20) |
30 (25-35) |
| Streptomycin |
15 (12-18) |
1 5(12-18) |
* The recommended daily dose of ethambutol is
higher in children (20mg/kg)than in adults (15mg/kg),because
the pharmacokinetics are different (peak serum ethambutol
concentrations are lower in children than in adults receiving
the same mg/kg dose)
Standard 9
To foster and assess
adherence, a patient-centered approach to administration of
drug treatment, based on the patient's need and mutual respect
between the patient and the provider, should be developed
for all patients. Supervision and support should be gender
sensitive and age-specific and should draw on the full range
of recommended interventions and available support services,
including patient counseling and education.
A central element of the patient-centered
strategy is the use of measures to assess and promote adherence
to treatment regimen and to address poor adherence when it
occurs. These measures should be tailored to the individual
patient's circumstances and be mutually acceptable to the
patient and the provider.
Such measures may include direct
observation of medication ingestion (directly observed therapy
[DOT]) by a treatment supporter who is acceptable and accountable
to the patient and to the health system.
Standard 10
All patients should be monitored for response to therapy,
best judged in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis by follow-up
sputum microscopy (two specimens), at least at the time of
completion of the initial phase of treatment (2 months), at
5 months, and at the end of treatment. Patients who have positive
smears during the 5th month of treatment should
be considered as treatment failures and have therapy modified
appropriately (see standards 14 and 15). In patients with
extra-pulmonary tuberculosis and in children, the response
to treatment is best assessed clinically. Follow-up radiographic
examinations are usually unnecessary and might be misleading.
Standard 11
A written record of all medications given, bacteriologic
response, and adverse reactions should be maintained for all
patients.
Standard 12
In areas with a high prevalence of HIV infection in
the general population where tuberculosis and HIV infection
are likely to co-exist, HIV counseling and testing is indicated
for all tuberculosis patients a part of their routine management.
In areas with lower prevalence rates of HIV, HIV counseling
and testing is indicated for tuberculosis patients having
a history suggestive of high risk of HIV exposure.
Standard 13
All patients with tuberculosis
and HIV infection should be evaluated to determine if antiretroviral
therapy is indicated during the course of treatment for tuberculosis.
Appropriate arrangements for access to antiretroviral drugs
should be made for patients who meet indications for treatment.
Given the complexity of co-administration
of anti-tuberculosis treatment and retroviral therapy, consultation
with a physician who is an expert in this area is recommended
before initiation of concurrent treatment for tuberculosis
and HIV infection, regardless of which disease appeared first.
However, initiation of treatment for tuberculosis should not
be delayed. Patients with tuberculosis and HIV infection should
also receive cotrimoxazole as prophylaxis for the infections.
Standard 14
An assessment
of the likelihood of drug resistance, based on history of
previous treatment, exposure to a possible source case having
drug-resistant organisms, and the community prevalence of
drug resistance, should be obtained for all patients. Patients
who fail treatment, and chronic cases, should always be assessed
for possible drug resistance. For patients in whom drug resistance
is considered to be likely, culture and drug susceptibility
testing (DST) for isoniazide, rifampicin and ethambutol should
be done promptly.
Standard 15
Patients with tuberculosis
caused by drug –resistant (especially) organisms should be
treated with specialized regimens containing second line anti-tuberculosis
drugs. At least four drugs to which the organisms are known
or presumed to be susceptible should be used and treatment
should be given for at least 18 months. Patient-centered measures
are required to ensure adherence. Consultation with a provider
experienced in treatment of patients with MDR tuberculosis
should be obtained.
STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC- HEALTH RESPONSIBILITIES
Standard 16
All providers of care for patients with tuberculosis should
ensure that people (especially children under 5years of age
and those with HIV infection) who are in close contact with
patients who have infectious tuberculosis are evaluated and
managed in line with international recommendations. Children
under 5years of age and people with HIV infection who have
been in contact with an infectious case should be evaluated
for both latent infection with M tuberculosis and for active
tuberculosis.
Standard 17
All providers must report both new and re-treatment tuberculosis
cases and their treatment outcomes to local public-health
authorities, in conformance with applicable legal requirements
and policies.
REFERENCES
Philip C Hopewell, Madhukar
Pai, Dermot Maher, Mukund Uplekar, Mario C Ravigilione. International
standards for tuberculosis Care. The Lancet Inf Dis 2006;
6:710-725.
|
 |