| |
March 2009 - Volume 3, Issue
2
Differentials of Arsenicosis in
Bangladesh
 |
Tapan Kumar Roy
Assistant Professor
|
 |
Department
of Population Science and Human Resources Development,
University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205,
Email:
tapkroy@yahoo.com, roy.tapan@gmail.com |
| ABSTRACT
This study was conducted on
the basis of primary data on 250 arsenicosis patients
from the arsenic affected districts Nawabganj, Bangladesh.
The data indicates that most of the patients are young,
illiterate, of low socioeconomic background and they
are suffering from various diseases such as diabetes,
blood pressure, asthma and heart diseases. The finding
also shows that arsenicosis disease has changed the
socioeconomic status of the patients and women are divorced
due to arsenicosis. The multivariate analysis suggests
that source of drinking water is the most important
factor for arsenicosis. Proper initiatives should be
taken immediately for the welfare of mankind.
Key Words: Arsenicosis,
Arsenic Contamination, Safe Drinking Water, Multiple
Classification Analysis
|
INTRODUCTION
Arsenic contamination of groundwater
and its adverse impact on people has been identified as one
of the most horrendous man-made environmental disasters of
the twentieth as well as twenty -first centuries. The CBS
television of USA compared it with the Chernobyl atomic reactor
accident of Russia and Bhopal chemical industry accident of
India, with UNICEF and WHO responsible for this extensive
and horrible tragedy in Bangladesh (New York Times, 1998).
More than 50 per cent of the total population is estimated
at risk of contamination and already thousands of people have
been affected by the disease arsenicosis (Khan MM et al. 2003).
The number of people affected by this arsenic disaster is
among the greatest of any disease facing the world today and
about 130 million people in 62 districts out of 64 are vulnerable
to arsenic contamination (Momotaj et. al., 2001).
Arsenicosis is known as a disease
borne by drinking arsenic contaminated water over a long period.
The symptoms of this disease manifest after a long period
such as from 5 to 20 years from when people start drinking
arsenic contaminated water. The period differs from patient
to patient depending on the amount of arsenic ingested, nutritional
status of the person, immunity level of the individual and
the total time period of arsenic ingestion. The different
signs and symptoms are observed among arsenicosis patients
such as colour changes on the skin, hard patches on the palms
and soles of the feet, skin cancer, cancers of the bladder,
kidney and lung, and diseases of blood vessels of the legs
and feet, and reproductive disorders, etc. The apparent symptoms
of arsenicosis may be said to have manifested in patients
as melanosis and keratosis mainly. Melanosis is the earliest
symptom and is a very common symptom. It results in the gradual
change of complexions towards blackishness and or duskiness.
Generally, the limbs are first affected and subsequently the
change affects all of the body, which is named 'diffuse melanosis'.
In the process of melanosis, white and black spots occur over
the body, medically termed as 'spotted melanosis', and this
stage of melanosis is generally a pre-cursor of cancer. On
the other hand, the hardening and thickening of palms and
soles is called keratosis.
Diffuse with modular keratosis on
palms and soles is a sign of moderately severe toxicity. Rough,
dry skin often with palpable modules in dorsum of hands, feet
and legs are the symptoms seen in severe cases.
The arsenic contamination of the
ground water of Bangladesh is not only the reason forserious
health hazards for the people, but also the cause of a widespread
social problem (Quamruzzaman and Rahman, 1998). This pollution
also creates serious social problems in family relations in
the rural areas. It is difficult to arrange marriage for a
young girl affected by arsenic. Some affected housewives are
divorced by their husbands and even forcibly sent to their
paternal home with children. The consequence of this contamination,
is that the life of a child faces risks every moment; active
people become inactive and overall it creates formidable difficulties
for the progress of socioeconomic development in this country.
People who drink arsenic contaminated
water (>0.05 mg/l) for 5 to 10 years are attacked by arsenicosis
and they have also a risk of developing cancer. The consumption
of arsenic contaminated groundwater over a prolonged period
of time has adverse health effects such as arsenical dermatosis,
melanosis, leuco-melanosis, keratosis, hyperkeratosis, ulcer,
gangrene and several other symptoms of arsenicosis (Khan et
al. 1997, Haque R et al. 2003, Saha K.C. 2003, Khan MM et
al. 2003).
In 1987, the first arsenicosis patient
was identified at Baroghoria in Nawabganj district, Bangladesh.
The Department of Public Health Engineering confirmed the
presence of arsenic in tube-wells in the same district in
1993. They detected 8 arsenicosis patients through a survey
in 1994. They have also argued that about 8 million people
belonging to 61 of 64 districts have been affected with arsenicosis.
At present, there are about 10,000 to 14,000 registered arsenicosis
patients and among them hundreds of patients have already
died (Mitra A. K. et al. 2002). It is surprising that there
are no official statistics about the death caused by arsenicosis.
The unofficial statistics suggest that the disease has claimed
several hundreds of lives over the year (Silver J. and Wilson
R. 2003).
In the backdrop of the above discussion,
the arsenic catastrophe is considered as a great threat to
the future generations in Bangladesh. This country has emerged
as the most vulnerable place with regards to arsenic pollution
as the extent and spread of the problem has taken a serious
turn. Our next generation will be subject to a more dangerous
situation due to arsenic poisoning. This is the right time
to be aware of the problem and take steps to combat the spread
of arsenic pollution. The present paper investigates the differentials
of arsenic affected people in Bangladesh. This study also
examines the socioeconomic conditions and factors affecting
arsenic patients.
DATA AND METHODOLOGY
The data was collected on 250 arsenic
patients by using a simple random sampling technique from
May 15 2005 to June 30, 2005. For this sampling, the patient
list was collected from the Civil Surgeon office of Nawabganj
district in Rajshahi division. For data collection purposes,
personal interview approach followed. This method relates
to the collection of information directly from the patients.
A patient was directly contacted and the desired information
was collected through pre-designed questionnaire. The purpose
of each question was explained to them and they were told
about the scope of the survey and manner in which the answers
were to be recorded. The multiple classification analysis
(MCA) was used to determine the contribution of various factors
on arsenicosis and to know the intensity of the influences
of the various factors. MCA can equally handle the normal
ordinal variables and can also deal with linear and non-linear
relationships of predictor variables with dependent variables.
The unadjusted eta-square (h2) coefficient is a correlation
ratio that explains how well the predictor variable explains
the variation in dependent variables by solving the normal
equations with only one predictor. This unadjusted coefficient
indicates the proportion of variance explained by a single
predictor alone. Similarly, the beta-square (b2) coefficient
indicates the proportion of variation explained by a predictor
variable taking into account the proportion explained by the
other predictor variables. The beta coefficient is compared
to the partial correlation coefficient in multiple regressions.
The MCA has advantages because it provides estimates of each
category of the predictor variable and at the same time provides
the coefficient for explaining the strength of the relationship.
In this study, arsenicosis condition is considered as a dependent
variable. The selected independent variables are: age, sex,
education, occupation, working status, source of drinking
water, watching television and listening to radio.
Background Characteristics of the Patients
Table 2 presents socio-economic and
demographic characteristics of the patients. The 250 arsenic
affected patients interviewed ranged in age from 8 to 65,
with a mean of 32 years. In this analysis, age was grouped
into four classes according to human life cycles such as children,
adolescents, youths and older aged. The respondents tend to
be young with the largest proportion in their middle age or
even younger (61.2 per cent). Only 6.8 per cent are under
age 10 years of age, 19.6 per cent are adolescents aged 10-19
years and that less than thirteen per cent (12.4 per cent)
are older than 50 and over. About half (54.4 per cent) of
the sample was female and the rest (45.6 per cent) of the
samples were males. Besides this, about a quarter (24.8 per
cent) of the sample was single, while more than half (59.2
per cent) were married at the time of the interview, with
4.8 per cent divorced and 11.2 per cent widowed. The educational
level of respondents was generally low. The majority of the
respondents (44.0 per cent) were illiterate or had no education.
More than a quarter of the respondents (32.0 per cent) had
completed primaryeducation, whilst 14.0 per cent had completed
secondaryeducation. A small proportion (10.0 per cent) had
completed a higher level of education (graduate and higher
education). All occupational categories of rural society were
represented. The occupations of patients varied widely representing
diverse segments of rural Bangladeshi society, including agricultural
laborer, day laborers, businessmen, unemployed and others.
32.0 per cent of the sample worked as agricultural laborers,
20.0 per cent worked as day laborers and 6.8 per cent worked
in small business and 1.2 per cent worked in other occupations.
Table
2. Distribution of arsenicosis patients by some selected
socio-economic and
demographic characteristics. |
| Variables |
N |
Percentage
(%) |
Age
< 10 years
10-19 years
20-59 years
50 and over
Mean and SD |
17
49
153
31 |
6.8
19.6>
61.2
12.4 |
Mean=31.77 |
Sex
Male
Female |
114
136 |
45.6
54.4 |
Marital
Status
Single
Married
Divorced
Widowed |
62
148
12
28 |
24.8
59.2
4.8
11.2 |
Education
No education
Primary
Secondary
Higher |
110
80
35
25 |
44.0
32.0
14.0
10.0 |
Occupation
Not working
Agricultural labor
Day labor
Small business
Others |
100
80
50
17
3
|
40.0
32.0
20.0
6.8
1.2 |
Sources
of drinking water
Tube-well
Well
Others |
151
76
23 |
60.4
30.4
9.2 |
Watching
Television
Yes
No
Listening Radio
Yes
No
Reading Newspaper
Yes
No |
65
185
112
138
33
217
|
26.0
74.0
44.8
55.2
13.2
86.8
|
Drinking arsenic contaminated water
is assumed to be the major cause of arsenicosis. The result
indicates that tube-wells are the major sources of drinking
water. 60.4 per cent of patients obtain drinking water from
tube-wells; 30.4 per cent use well water for their drinking
purposes and fewer (9.2 per cent) depend on other sources
of water including pond, tank, lake, river, etc. In this study,
mass media variables such as watching television, listening
to radio and reading newspapers are considered important media
to acquire knowledge about the disease, its prevention and
cure. The results in Table 2 exhibit that 26.0 per cent of
patients watch television, 44.8 per cent listen to radio and
13.2 per cent read newspaper regularly.
Table 3 indicates the health characteristics
of the patients. The most common illnesses reported by the
patients were asthma (15.6 per cent), diabetes (10.4 per cent),
heart disease (9.2 per cent), blood pressure (5.2 per cent)
and other diseases (9.6 per cent). Among the patients, 52.0
per cent are suffering second stages, 44.0 per cent are in
first stages and only 4.0 per cent are in third stages. More
than half of the patients (54.8 per cent) were suffering various
physical problems. It is noted that 60.8 per cent have been
suffering arsenicosis for five years and below, 32.4 per cent
have been suffering forsix to ten years and only 6.8 per cent
had been suffering ten years and above. Below fifty per cent
of the patients (41.2 per cent) had taken any treatment for
arsenicosis. More than fifty per cent of the patients (58.8)
didn't take any treatment. 28.0 per cent took treatment from
an NGO, 10.0 per cent from thana health complex and 3.2 per
cent had taken treatment from other sources.
| Table
3. Distribution of arsenicosis patients by some selected
health characteristics |
| Variables |
Number
of respondents |
Percentage |
Suffer
from Diseases
Asthma
Diabetes
Heart disease
Blood pressure
Others
No problem |
39
26
23
13
24
132 |
15.6
10.4
9.2
5.2
9.6
52.8 |
Condition
of Arsenicosis
Initial stage
Second stage
Third stage |
110
130
10 |
44.0
52.0
4.0 |
Physical
Problem
Yes
No |
137
113 |
54.8
45.2 |
Duration
of Disease
<5 Years
6-10 Years
10+Years |
152
81
17 |
60.8
32.4
6.8 |
Taken
any Treatment
Yes
No |
152
98 |
60.8
39.2 |
Taken
Treatment From
NGO
Thana Health Complex
Others
No treatment |
70
25
8
147 |
28.0
10.0
3.2
58.8 |
Changes in the Socio-Economic
Status of Patients
An attempt is made to observe what
changes occurred to the economic status of patients before
and after contracting the disease. For this purpose, the socio-economic
status such as working status, kind of work, monthly income,
monthly costs and invitation to social ceremonies among the
patients prior to the disease are compared with those after
disease occurrence.
About 60 percent of patients were
working before contracting the disease but after having the
disease it declined to 34 percent. Some of the patients got
day laborer jobs (20.0 per cent), some got small business
related jobs (6.8 per cent), most engaged in agricultural
activities (32.0 per cent) and 40.0 per cent were not working
before the disease. A radical change of working patterns was
observed after the disease. The majority (58 per cent) didn't
work after the disease. Due to the disease, agricultural labor,
day labor and business work declined to 45 per cent, 29 per
cent and 60 per cent respectively.
The disease directly impacts on patients'
monthly income. Before the disease the average monthly income
of patients was 2556.75 taka and after the disease it has
changed to 1563.35 taka. Before the disease, 4 per cent earn
monthly salary of 1000 taka and below, 32 per cent earnt 1001
to 2000 taka, 22 per cent earnt 2001 to 3000 taka and only
2 per cent earnt 3000 and above taka. After the disease, it
has changed to , 22.0 per cent earnt 1000 and below taka,
14.0 per cent earnt 1001 to 2000 taka, 5.6 per cent earnt
2001 to 3000 taka and a small (0.4 per cent) proportion earnt
3001 and above taka. Actually, family income of patients showed
a tremendous decrease after the disease. With deterioration
of their condition, the patients gradually lose their ability
to work and thus they fall into poverty. Disease also affects
expenditure status of patients. Due to disease occurrence,
their costs of living have increased. Before the disease,
monthly average costs orf patients were 1675.50 taka and after
the disease it has changed to 1985.15 taka. Arsenic patients
cannot move freely due to social problems. Most of the villagers
consider arsenicosis is a contagious disease. Nobody wants
to come into contact with the arsenic-affected people and
avoid inviting them for social functions. In this study, there
has been shown a marked difference in invitations to social
functions between before and after disease among the arsenicosis
patients. It is found in Table 3 that 94.4 per cent had got
invitations before the disease, whereas, after the disease
it had declined to 34.0 per cent.
| Table
4. Changes in the socioeconomic status of the patients
due to arsenicosis |
|
Variables |
Before disease |
After disease |
| N |
Percent |
N |
Percent |
Working
Status
Working
Not Working |
150
100 |
60.0
40.0 |
85
165 |
34.0
66.0 |
Kinds
of Work
Not working
Agricultural
Day Labor
Business
Others |
100
80
50
17
3 |
40.0
32.0
20.0
6.8
1.2 |
145
65
30
7
3 |
58.0
26.0
12.0
2.8
1.2 |
Monthly
Income
Not Working
1000 and below
1001-2000
2001-3000
3001 and above
Mean |
100
10
80
55
5
2556.76 |
40.0
4.0
32.0
22.0
2.0 |
145
55
35
14
1
1563.35 |
58.0
22.0
14.0
5.6
0.4 |
Monthly
Cost
No
<1000
1001-1500
1501-2000
2500+
Mean |
30
80
65
43
32
1675.50 |
12.0
32.0
26.0
17.2
12.8 |
20
50
85
55
40
1985.15 |
8.0
20.0
34.0
22.0
16.0 |
Invitation
to Social Functions
Yes
No |
236
14 |
94.4
5.6 |
166
84 |
34.0
66.0 |
Differentials of Arsenicosis
In this analysis, the selected variables
age, sex, education, occupation, working status, source of
drinking water, watching television and listening to radio
are considered as the determinants of arsenicosis. The results
are described in Table 5. Among the selected factors, source
of drinking water is the most effective ,(h2=0.31 and b2=0.28).
The mean number of arsenicosis patient is 1.80 who drink tube-well
water and 1.35 who drink other sources of
water. We may conclude that tube-well is one of the sources
of arsenicosis. Education has emerged as the important determinant
for arsenicosis. It is important to note that literate people
have been found to have lower prevalence of arsenicosis. On
average 1.52 persons are affected by arsenicosis who are literate
whereas, 1.73 person are affected by arsenic contamination,
who are illiterate. It may be that literate people have knowledge
of arsenic contamination and they avoid drinking arsenic contaminated
water. The work status of patients shows a substantial effect
of arsenicosis. The patients who were involved in income generating
activities had a lower (1.42) number of arsenicosis sufferers
than their non-working (1.91) counterparts. It is often observed
in developing societies that occupation is closely associated
with social status. It shows a moderate effect on arsenicosis
(h=0.05 and b=0.06).
Day laborers (1.30) tend to have
a higher prevalence of arsenicosis than the average, followed
by agricultural laborers (1.28), small businessmen (1.19)
and others (1.14). Sex differentials are observed among arsenic
patients. Females (1.62) have a higher prevalence of disease
than their male (1.51) counterparts. Age also shows relatively
weak influence on explaining variation in mean numbers of
arsenicosis patients (h=0.002 and b=0.003). Middle aged (1.85)
persons are more vulnerable to developing arsenicosis than
young (1.47) and older (1.55) persons. The patients who do
not watch television or listen to radio are more likely to
attack from arsenicosis than those patients who are exposed
to some mass media. On average 1.54 patients have arsenicosis
who don't watch television, whereas 1.45 patient have arsenicosis
who watch television. On the other hand, the mean number of
arsenic patients who don't listen to radio have a 0.5 higher
prevalence of disease than those who listen to the radio.
Table
5. Results of multiple classification analysis of
arsenicosis patients by
selected some socio-demographic variables |
|
Variable |
Unadjusted |
Adjusted |
Correlation ratio |
2 |
2 |
Age
< 10 years
10-19 years
20-59 years
50 and over |
1.45
1.85
1.67 |
1.47
1.80
1.55 |
.002 |
.003 |
Sex
Male
Female |
1.50
1.65 |
1.51
1.62 |
.046 |
.051 |
Education
Illiterate
Literate |
1.75
1.43 |
1.73
1.52 |
.083 |
.065 |
Occupation
Housewife
Student
Others |
1.67
1.50
1.48 |
1.63
1.57
1.52 |
.051 |
.038 |
Working
status
Yes
No |
1.43
1.82 |
1.42
1.91 |
.071 |
.083 |
Source
of drinking water
Tube-well
Other |
1.78
1.43 |
1.80
1.35 |
.31 |
.28 |
Watching
television
Yes
No |
1.43
1.68 |
1.52
1.54 |
.003 |
.005 |
Listening
radio
Yes
No |
1.38
1.59 |
1.47
1.51 |
.006 |
.004 |
Grand
Mean= 1.65
Proportion variation explained, R2=0.57 |
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The study reveals some of the important
features of arenicosis patients at Nawabganj in Bangladesh.
It is evident from the data that more than half of the patients
were over twenty years of age. The patients are mostly the
young generation, with the largest proportion in their middle
age and a sizeable portion are old. The arsenic poses a serious
threat to young generations (Watanabe et al. 2003). It is
also noted that more than half of the patients were female.
Ahmad et al. (1999) observed similar findings. They also showed
that female arsenicosis patients were mostly illiterate and
most of the patients were between 10 to 39 years. The data
also indicates that the sample is uneducated; about sixty
per cent were married at the time of interview, a quarter
were single and a noticeable proportion were divorced or widowed.
The divorced patients were due to the cause of arsenicosis.
The result indicates that the majority
of the patients drink tube-well water. In this connection,
Khan et al. (1997) conducted a study on arsenic contamination
in ground water and its toxicity effect on health. They found
that tube-well was the main source of arsenic contaminated
water. Those who were drinking contaminated tube-well water,
were attacked by melanosis, keratosis, hyperkeratosis and
depigmentation (Leukomelanosis) is common. It is noted in
a study that more than 50 percent of the tube-wells in 62
out of 64 districts contain more than 0.05 mg of arsenic per
liter of water (Momotaj H. et al.: 2001). There is need to
take the initiative for developing appropriate alternative
water supply options immediately. There is also need to develop
awareness about the problems associated with arsenic contamination
in drinking water. It has been observed in this study that
the maximum number of patients have low socioeconomic status
and they are very poor. More than fifty per cent of arsenic
patients were suffering from various physical problems. They
suffered from different diseases such as diabetes, heart disease,
blood pressure and asthma. Several studies have suggested
that arsenic patients have been suffering from various physical
problems and several diseases (Khan et al. 1997, Rahman et
al. 1998, Khan MM et al. 2003). It has been observed that
the maximum number of patients are in first and second stages,
which can be curable. Immediate action should be taken to
provide adequate medicine, proper treatment, nutritious food
and availability of pure drinking water. Proper steps should
be taken to identify arsenicosis patients with their particular
disease and stages of arsenicosis accurately on an emergency
basis. In this connection government should take proper action
for detecting the early signs of arsenicosis on a regular
basis.
Exposure to knowledge and awareness
is very poor among arsenic patients. A few proportion of patients
watch television, listen to the radio and read newspapers
daily. It is essential to have the involvement of mass media
and development of information, education and communication
material for awareness of the people. For this purpose, campaigns
in mass media (radio/television/newspaper/magazine/poster/bill
board) should be increased indicating the causes of arsenicosis
disease, its effects and efforts to be free from arsenic contamination
water. Government and non-governmental levels should take
proper steps to increase and modify mass media exposure to
arsenicosis i.e. existing programs and steps which are being
campaigned in the radio/television/newspaper/magazine/ poster/bill
board need to improve the knowledge and attitudes and also
should increase the publicity regarding safe drinking water
messages in the mass media. The data indicates that the occurrence
of arsenic disease has changed the socioeconomic condition
of arsenic patients. This disease influences working status,
occupation, income, finances and invitations for social functions,
of the patients. Due to disease occurrence their incomes have
decreased but living cost has increased. It has been found
that people exclude them from various social activities. Due
to arsenic disease they are less efficient than before. It
is remarkable that arsenicosis is not a contagious disease.
On the other hand, the mean arsenic patient who doesn't listen
to the radio has a 0.5 higher prevalence of disease than those
who listen to the radio.
Arsenicosis should not be thought
of as a fault of the patients and the patients should not
be socially boycotted. Motivation and awareness should be
increased regarding arsenicosis disease. It can be concluded
that due to lack of literacy, superstitions, insufficient
awareness and scarcity of proper motivational programs at
both governmental and non-governmental levels, the arsenic
problem has been creating a serious crisis in rural Bangladesh.
The patients should be diagnosed at their early stages. At
the same time, safe drinking water should be supplied to the
affected areas as immediate relief on an emergency basis.
Proper initiatives should be taken to make people aware of
any method of removing arsenic from water prior to introducing
the method.
REFERENCES
Haque R., Mazumder DN, Samanta S.,
Ghosh N., Kalman D., Smith MM, Mitra S., Santra A., Lahiri
S., Das S., De BK and Smith AH (2003). Arsenic in drinking
water and skin lesions: dose-response data from West Bengal,
India, Epidemiology 2003, March 14(2), 174-82.
Khan A.W., Ahmad Akhtar S, Sayed
Salim Ullah M.H., Hadi Ahdul S, Khan M.H., Jali M.A., Ahmed
R., and Faruquee (1997). Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater
and its Effect on Human Health with Particular Reference to
Bangladesh, Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 16(1),
65-73.
Khan A.W. and Sk. Ahmad A. (1997).
Arsenic in drinking water, health effects and managements
(A Training Manual), Department of Occupational and Environmental
Health, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine,
Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kshitish Chandra Saha (2003). Diagnosis
of arsenicosis, Journal of Environmental Science and Health,
Part-A-Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering,
38(1), 255-272.
Khan MM, Sakauchi F., Sonoda T.,
Washio M. and Mori M. (2003). Magnitude of arsenic toxicity
in tube-well drinking water in Bangladesh and its adverse
effects on human health including cancer: evidence from a
review of the literature, Asian Pac J Cancer Prevention, January-March
4(1), 7-14.
Momotaj H. and Hussain I. (2001).
Effect of Spirulina on Arsenicosis Patients in Bangladesh.
Presentation Prepared for Arsenic in Drinking
Water: An International Conference
at Columbia University, New York, November 26-27, 2001.
Mitra A.K., Bose B.K., Kabir H., Das B.K. and Hussain M. (2002).
Arsenic-related health problems among hospital patients in
southern Bangladesh, Journal of Health Population and Nutrition,
20(3), 198-204.
Quamruzzaman Q. and Rahman M. (1998).
Arsenicosis in Bangladesh, Dhaka Community Hospital Trust,
Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rahman M., Tondel M., Ahmad S.A.
and Axelsonl O. (1998). Diabetes Mellitus Associated with
Arsenic Exposure in Bangladesh, American Journal of Epidemiology,
Vol. 148, No.2, Pp.198-203.
Silver J. and Wilson R. (2003). Chronic Arsenic Poisoning:
History, Study and Remediation, Bangladesh Archives, 26 June
2003.
Silvia M. (2003). Arsenic in the
Groundwater, Bangladesh Archives, 29 April 2002.
The New York Times, New Bangladesh Disaster: Wells that pumps
poison, November 10, 1998.
Watanabe C., Inaoka T., Matsui T.,
Ishigaki K., Murayama N. and Ohtsuka R. (2003). Effects of
arsenic on younger generations, Journal of Environmental Science
and Health, Part-A-Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental
Engineering, 38(1), 129-139.
|
 |