| |
July 2009 - Volume 3, Issue
4
Controlling
costs of medical equipment in Hospitals of IUMSHS
 |
Noori Tajer, Maryam (PhD in health management,
Associate Professor of Islamic Azad University, Branch
Islamshahr Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
|
 |
| ABSTRACT
Much medical equipment in hospitals
has become technically defect and therefore runs out
of order every year, and as a result, a large proportion
of hospital expenditure isallocated to supplying and
repairing this equipment, and as such, great scientific
damage and economic losses are imposed on the health
care system of Iran. The purpose of the present cross
sectional study was to evaluate the maintenance status
and the controlling costs of medical equipment in the
hospitals of IUMSHS. In this regard, 284 items of medical
equipment and devices being used for at least 5 years
in the hospitals of IUMSHS were selected, (using the
stratified sampling method) and evaluated. The data
collection tool was a questionnaire completed by the
enquirer; descriptive and deductive statistics, biased
variance analysis, and Spearman's correlation coefficient
were used for data analysis. The research findings revealed
that about 60% of the medical equipment in the hospitals
of IUMSHS is controlled by the related employees, and
that a medical engineering and maintenance department
was absent in the investigated hospitals. In addition,
variance analysis revealed that the mean score of controlling
costs of the medical equipment did not show a statistically
significant difference as compared to various international
standards. Overall, the controlling costs of medical
equipment in the investigated hospitals was unacceptable
in 74.6% of the cases. In addition, there was a statistically
significant correlation between supplying status and
the costs (p<0.005; r = 0.35), between repairing
status and the costs (p<0.001; r = 0.15), and between
the training status and the costs (p<0.000; r = 0.35)
of medical equipment. The results of the present research
indicated the absence of appropriate planning for the
costs of medical equipment in the hospitals of IUMSHS.
Key Words: Controlling,
costs of medical equipment.
|
INTRODUCTION
Taking advantage of a sufficient
number of items of medical equipment and trained employees
for operating this equipment, guarantees the position of managers
in providing the best possible, accurate, and prompt health
care services and diagnostic systems in their hospitals.
According to studies performed in Iran, one third of the total
costs of establishing and equipping new hospitals is allocated
to purchasing medical equipment; on the other hand, during
budgeting, 10 - 20 % of the total price of this equipment
should be allocated to their maintenance and repair.
According to Kendal's study in 1998, more than 60% of medical
equipment lack facilities for their maintenance and repairing
is useless in some countries, and this problem should be solved
using the following plans:
1. Concurrent maintenance of medical equipment;
2. Controlling medical equipment;
3. Selecting appropriate medical equipment when purchasing
it; and
4. Providing basic training programs for technicians of medical
equipment.
Current evidence shows that ignoring maintenance, results
in malfunction of medical equipment, and ineffective maintenance
reduces hospital income and also confuses the patients and
wastes their time and money. On the other hand, replacing
and repairing the equipment imposes great costs on hospitals.
In this regard, Walsh suggests that implementing appropriate
maintenance systems may result in strategies that not only
increase the productivity of medical equipment, but also reduces
the mean duration of hospital admissions.
The aim of our study was the controlling costs of medical
equipment in the hospitals of IUMSHS, and noting this status
may be a necessity and a useful platform for future research
being performed in the hospitals of IUMSHS in Tehran, Iran.
 |
METHODOLOGY
The present cross sectional study
was performed regarding the controlling costs of medical equipment
in the hospitals of IUMSHS.
The study population consisted of all medical equipment in
the hospitals of IUMSHS, and regarding a 95% confidence interval
for estimating qualitative and quantitative variables of research
and also regarding acceptable accuracy levels for each of
the variables, the sample size was estimated to consist of
at least 10% of the population meeting the inclusion criteria
(n = 284).
In this research, the maintenance status of medical equipment
consists of actions performed for the status of controlling
costs of medical equipment, and includes the costs incurred
for the controlling, repairing, and providing training for
employees working with this equipment (being classified into
2 groups, namely: acceptable and unacceptable). Sampling was
performed by the stratified sampling method with appropriate
allocation, and the hospitals of IUMSHS in Tehran constituting
the strata.
Then, 10-15 % of the equipment of each hospital meeting the
inclusion criteria was selected by the simple random sampling
method, and was evaluated as the research sample.
The data collection tool was a questionnaire consisting of
2 sections: the first section pertaining to demographic characteristics
of the research subjects; and the second section was of the
4-choice Likert type, the choices being: always (3 points),
sometimes (2 points), rarely (1 point), and never (no points).
The mean and standard deviation were calculated after scoring,
the criteria for controlling costs of medical equipment being
defined as follows: acceptable (score of 1.5 - 3) and unacceptable
(score of 0 - 1.49).
The research method was as follows: the hospital managers
and related authorities were consulted for collecting background
data such as the number of wards equipped with medical equipment,
the type of medical equipment, and the financial authorities
and related experts in the hospitals who were consulted for
collecting data regarding the controlling costs of medical
equipment.
At the next stage, the clinical and pre-clinical departments
of the investigated hospitals (including the laboratory, operating
room, ICU, CCU, physical therapy, pathology, radiology, emergency
room, cardiology clinic, sterilization, internal medicine,
pediatrics and neonatology, burn care unit, orthopedics, neurology,
CT scan, ENT, ophthalmology, isolation unit, laser therapy,
nuclear medicine, plastic surgery, infectious diseases, renal
transplantation, hematology, and health care) were visited,
and according to the questionnaire (data recording sheet),
the operators were questioned regarding the controlling status
and the training provided for each item of medical equipment.
It should be noted that a separate questionnaire was completed
by the researcher for each item of equipment.
In addition, descriptive statistics were used for achieving
the objectives of the research, for answering the research
questions, and for analyzing the data; Spearman's correlation
coefficient and biased variance analysis were used for evaluating
the relationship between maintenance status and controlling
costs of medical equipment.
In the entire research, the criteria for calculating the means
were the scores obtained (with 0 being the minimum and 3 being
the maximum score).
 |
RESULTS
The results of the present research
revealed that regarding functional status, 45.7%, 64.5%, and
12.4% of the medical equipment in the hospitals of IUMSHS
were diagnostic, therapeutic, and educational/investigational
devices, respectively; the mean life expectancy of the equipment
was over 20 years.
The highest definite frequency of purchasing and installing
the medical equipment was observed from 1996 to 2000 (23.24%)
and from 1991 to 1995 (21.8%).
Diagram 1 reveals that most medical equipment in the investigated
hospitals met international standards and were manufactured
in Germany.
Cleaning of the devices was performed by technicians, the
medical equipment maintenance department, the experts, the
attendants, and the professionals in 44.8% (most frequent),
3.2% (least frequent), 7.8%, 39.9%, and 3.2% of the cases,
respectively.
30.4% of the investigated equipment lacked the required technical
documents, and 46.47% of the medical equipment in the investigated
hospitals had naming labels and the servicer's address attached
to the devices.
Regarding the operators' experience in operating the devices,
32.4%, 18.3%, 14.1% 13.4%, and 9.9% of the operators had <
5 years, 5-9 years, 11-14 years, 15-19 years, and over 20
years of experience in operating the devices, respectively.
In addition, catalogues were the most frequent technical document
present pertaining to the equipment in the investigated hospitals.
Most (30%) of the medical equipment in the investigated hospitals
were devices used in the laboratory and the operating room.
The results obtained after surveying operators regarding their
opinion about the purchasing conditions, revealed that most
of them (35.2%) considered all conditions (e.g. written certificate,
availability, cost-effectiveness, and possessing international
standards), and 24.6% of them said that purchasing the medical
equipment was cost effective.
Moreover, biased variance analysis showed that the mean scores
of supply status (F = 0.91), repair status (F = 0.08), training
status (F = 0.51), and cost status (F = 0.15) of medical equipment
did not have a statistically significant difference compared
to international standards.
Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviations of medical
equipment maintenance status in the investigated hospitals
and according to international standards.
| Table
1. Medical equipment supply status in the hospitals
of IUMSHS, according to international standards, 2000. |
| Country |
N |
Mean |
SD |
| USA (FDA) |
54 |
1.15 |
0.796 |
| Germany (TUV) |
82 |
1.2 |
0.6563 |
| England (BSI) |
16 |
0.9 |
0.5837 |
| Sum |
152 |
1.15 |
0.70 |
Variance analysis revealed that in
various standards, the mean score of medical equipment supply
status did not have a statistically significant difference
(F = 0.91)
In addition, the correlation
coefficient matrices in Table 2 shows that statistically significant
relations are seen between maintenance status and cost status
of medical equipment, between supply status and cost status
(p = 0.005, r = 0.35), between repair status and cost status
(p = 0.016, r = 0.15), and also between the training status
and cost status of medical equipment.
| Table
2. The correlation coefficient matrices between the
various maintenance (supplying, repairing, and training)
variables and the controlling costs of the investigated
medical equipment in the hospitals of IUMSHS, Tehran,
Iran. |
| Variables |
Supplying |
Repairing |
Training |
Costs |
|
Supplying |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Repairing |
r = 0.37 p = 0.000 |
1 |
|
|
|
Training |
r = 0.36 p = 0.000 |
r = 0.26 p = 0.000 |
1 |
|
|
Costs |
r = 0.35 p = 0.005 |
r = 0.15 p = 0.016 |
r = 0.32 p = 0.000 |
1 |
* The medical equipment cost status
was unacceptable in 77.4% and acceptable in 22.6% of the cases,
respectively.
DISCUSSION
According to the facts presented
in the "Results" section, neither of the investigated
hospitals had a medical engineering and maintenance department.
After performing research on the hospitals of England for
7 years, Hosper (1991) suggested that the presence of a medical
engineering department reduces the hospital costs by 30% on
average. In this regard, the results performed by Jadidi showed
that neither of the hospitals in Arak, Iran have a medical
engineering department. Most (28.9%) medical equipment present
in the hospitals of IUMSHS was manufactured in Germany. In
Jadidi's research performed in Arak, 27.93% of the medical
equipment present in the hospitals of Arak University of Medical
Sciences was manufactured in Germany. This fact reveals that
Germany has more commercial relationships with Iran and therefore,
provides better facilities for exporters, manufacturing companies,
and customers.
Evaluation of the technical documents pertaining to the medical
equipment in the hospitals of IUMSHS revealed that a user
manual for medical equipment was present in 37.2% of the cases
in the investigated hospitals.
Due to the great importance of the user manual for training
the operators, such a manual should be procured and translated
(if needed).
A service manual was present in 15.6 % of the investigated
medical equipment. In this manual, the servicing process and
the effective inspection timetable for medical equipment is
presented; thus, it should be carefully studied and carefully
respected by the medical engineering and maintenance department
or by the companies offering after sales service.
In this regard, Kumar (1998) performed research on describing
anesthesia machines and concluded that a well-designed checklist
for anesthesia machines was present in only 8.8% of the investigated
hospitals.
A catalogue was present in 64.8% of the investigated medical
equipment. This figure was reported to be 42% in a study performed
by Mohammadi-Nejad in 1993 on the hospitals of IUMSHS.
Generally speaking, it seems that the operators and the various
hospital authorities pay no attention to recording and maintaining
the technical documents of medical equipment and don't consider
a well-defined place for filing these important documents.
In addition, during his research, Mohammadi-Nejad suggested
that in neither of the investigated hospitals was a "Maintenance
and Educating Committee" present for keeping the compiled
guidelines.
Due to the critical role of international standards in effective
maintenance of medical equipment, it is claimed that most
medical equipment is under the supervision of a well known
standard (such as TUV of Germany, FDA of USA, BSI of England,
CSA of Canada, etc.), partly as a result of the export regulations
of these countries which don't permit exportation of medical
equipment lacking the required standards. Overall, 53% of
the investigated medical equipment had an international standard,
28.88% of which had TUV of Germany, 5.6 % having BSI of England,
19.1% having FDA of USA, and the remaining 12.3% having IRN
of Iran, and 10.56 % having JS of Japan (being present only
for medical equipment manufactured in Japan).
If this equipment was manufactured in East Asian countries
under the license of Japan, they usually lacked a confirmed
international standard.
In this regard, biased variance analysis regarding the mean
scores of the investigated medical equipment maintenance status
(according to the international standards of Germany, USA,
and England) did not show a statistically significant difference,
i.e. neither of the TUV, FDA, or BSI standards provided services
(for improving training, supplying, and repairing status)
to the hospitals of IUMSHS; this could be due to a lack of
appropriate planning before purchasing the equipment.
According to the research findings, in most cases (40%), cleaning
the medical equipment in the investigated hospitals was performed
by the attendants, and in Jadidi's research, this figure was
reported to be 54%. Regarding the regulations of maintenance
accompanied with prevention, in which cleaning has been entrusted
to the operators or the medical engineering and maintenance
department personnel, entrusting this task to the attendants
isn't justifiable and may cause irreversible damage to the
equipment.
Regarding the medical equipment's standards, the results of
our study indicate that 46.1% of the medical equipment did
not have any of the required standards (e.g. FDA, TUV, BSI,
CSA, JS), probably due to inappropriate purchasing strategies
and also due to ignoring the need to acquire the technical
expert's opinion regarding the quality of the equipment. Usually,
the lower price of the equipment is considered the most important
factor at the time of purchasing.
The results of research performed by Sunseri (1999) in this
regard indicated that in two thirds of the investigated hospitals,
the medical equipment's status regarding international standards
were such that a number of items of medical equipment (especially
in departments such as pharmacies, laundries, etc.) were out
of order each year and should be discarded.
Regarding the training of medical equipment operators, the
results obtained show that 74.8% of the operators need training,
which in turn indicates that some hospital authorities disregard
the importance of training, which causes the sub-optimal utilization
of medical equipment.
On the other hand, 46.1% of the operators noted they had never
received any training courses related to the medical equipment;
in Jadidi's research, 76% of the operators needed training.
Due to job transfer common among the operators, their incomplete
understanding of the materials being instructed, or the defective
training provided by the supplying companies, it is suggested
that hospital authorities pay more attention to periodic and
frequent training.
In this regard, training was often (in 44.9% of the cases)
rendered by supervisors of the pertinent wards; however, this
training should be provided by the medical engineering and
maintenance department of the hospitals or the engineers of
the companies providing after sales service, which results
in appropriate utilization of medical equipment.
56.7% of the equipment was useless due to the lack of spare
parts and overdue repairing. In 1991, Wong performed research
on medical equipment in Brazil and indicated this figure to
be 20 - 40%, and suggested the spare parts to be supplied
beforehand, in order to reduce the time required for repairing
and servicing, and to prevent losses in hospital income or
in services provided for patients.
According to the research findings, the mean time interval
between the announcement of defects and the completion of
repairs was at least 1 month. This could be due to a lack
of coordination and also due to inappropriate relationships
between hospitals, the company's monopoly, or overdue payment
of repairing and servicing fees by the financial departments
of the hospitals.
Regarding the importance of the mean repair time of the medical
equipment, Dikerson suggested that since the mean repair time
indicates promptness of after sales services provided by the
companies and the attention they pay to their customers, this
time interval should be reduced to the least possible interval,
i.e. a few days.
In 2000, Augusta performed research on preventive maintenance
of medical equipment, and suggested that decision-making regarding
preventive maintenance is accomplished using two managerial
tools:
1. Management plan of medical equipment, and
2. The valuation system of medical equipment maintenance.
The results of his research revealed
that 49% of the defects could be prevented by preventive maintenance.
The authorities of the maintenance
department and the procurement department in the hospitals
should emphasize and pay attention to other commitments. In
the present study, the least frequent (2.9%) commitment acquired
was related to consumed accessories, because most of these
accessories are produced in Iran, and also because hospitals
store them in their warehouses.
The controlling costs of medical equipment indicated that
the costs of medical equipment was unacceptable in 77.4% of
the cases, and 9.6% of the yearly budget was allocated to
repairing and servicing medical equipment. In research performed
in 1993, Mohammadi-Nejad reported that documents indicating
purchasing costs, maintenance and repair costs and the yearly
total budget were available in neither of the hospitals of
IUMSHS.
In research conducted in relation to the yearly budget of
hospitals, Kendal suggested that the hospital authorities
should allocate one fourth of their total yearly budget to
the controlling costs of medical equipment.
In the present research, a special budget (expressed as a
certain fraction of the hospital total budget) was allocated
to the controlling costs in only 24% of the investigated hospitals,
and regarding the mean and standard deviations (being 1.08
and 0.66, respectively), the medical equipment cost status
in the investigated hospitals was defined as low to intermediate.
In his article titled "The structure of service centers
for economical efficiency", Irnichw (1999) stated that
for beds 100 need 1 person and that there are differences
between the
medical equipment in the investigated hospitals.
Therefore, statistically significant relations are seen between
maintenance status and cost status of medical equipment, but
the correlation coefficient matrices have no correlation coefficient
between two variables showed that the perhaps reasons are
that there was no correct planning system of Repair and Supply
status of medical equipment.
 |
REFERENCES
- Kendal st., Frieens., Jastemple
jo.,etal." flexibility program scheduling of preventive
management biomedical instrument of technology " Journal
of clinical engineering.1998:26(mar-apr):25-28.
- Galal Abdel-Hamid Abdellah, Salah
El-Din Mohamed Fahmy Taher, and Somaya Hosny "Review
of the utilization of HEEPF - competitive projects for educational
enhancement in the Egyptian medical sector". Hum Resour
Health. 2008; 6: 7. Published online 2008 April 18.
- Junaid A Razzak, Adnan A Hyder,
Tasleem Akhtar, Mubashir Khan, and Uzma R Khan "Assessing
emergency medical care in low income countries: A pilot study
from Pakistan BMC Emerg Med". 2008; 8: 8. Published online
2008 July 3.
- Hassan H Dib, Xilong Pan, and Hong
Zhang "Evaluation of the new rural cooperative medical
system in China: is it working or not?" Into J Equity
Health. 2008; 7: 17. Published online 2008 July 1.
- Proceedings of the Australasian
Association of Clinical Biochemists' 44th Annual Scientific
Conference"Clin Brioche Rev. 2006 November; 27(4): S11-S45.
- Lin-fu Zhou, Hai-hong Zhu, Jun
Lin, Min-jun Hu, Feng Chen, and Zhi Chen J Zhejiang "Surveillance
of viral contamination of invasive medical instruments in
dentistry Univ Sci B. 2006 September; 7(9): 745-748. Published
online 2006 August 15.
- Anna Maria Di Nallo, Lidia Strigari,
Claudia Giliberti, Angelico Bedini, Raffaele Palomba, and
Marcello Benassi "Monitoring of people and workers exposure
to the electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields in an
Italian national cancer Institute ". J Exp Cline Cancer
Res. 2008; 27(1): 16. Published online 2008 July 3.
- Joseph D Njau, Catherine A Goodman,
S Patrick Kachur, Jo Mulligan, John S Munkondya, Naiman Mchomvu,
Salim Abdulla, Peter Bloland, and Anne Mill "The costs
of introducing artemisinin-based combination therapy: evidence
from district-wide implementation in rural Tanzania"
Malar J. 2008; 7: 4. Published online 2008 January 7.
- Gianna Moscato, Olivier Vandenplas,
Roy Gerth Van Wijk, Jean-Luc Malo, Luca Perfetti, Santiago
Quirce, Jolanta Walusiak, Roberto Castano, Gianni Pala, Denyse
Gautrin, Hans De Groot, Ilenia Folletti, Mona Rita Yacoub,
and Andrea Siracusa."EAACI position paper on occupational
rhinitis Respir" Res. 2009; 10(1): 16. Published online
2009 March 3.
-Xiaoming Li, Bonita Stanton, Xinguang
Chen, Yan Hong, Xiaoyi Fang, Danhua Lin, Rong Mao, and Jin
Wang "Health Indicators and Geographic Mobility among
Young Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China" World Health
Popul. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 February 21.
- Kenshi Hayashida, Yuichi Imanaka,
and Haruhisa Fukud "Measuring hospital-wide activity
volume for patient safety and infection control: a multi-centre
study in Japan" BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7: 140. Published
online 2007 September 3.
-T Joseph D Njau, Catherine A Goodman,
S Patrick Kachur, Jo Mulligan, John S Munkondya, Naiman Mchomvu,
Salim Abdulla, Peter Bloland, and Anne Mills "The costs
of introducing artemisinin-based combination therapy: evidence
from district-wide implementation in rural Tanzania"
Malar J. 2008; 7: 4. Published online 2008 January 7.
- Zakari Y Aliyu "Policy mapping
for establishing a national emergency health policy for Nigeria"
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2002; 2: 5. Published online 2002
August 15.
- Chi Ping Yu, David K Whynes, and
Tracey H Sach "Equity in health care financing: The case
of Malaysia" Int J Equity Health. 2008; 7: 15. Published
online 2008 June 9.
|
 |