October 2007 - Volume 1, Issue 5

THE EFFECT OF A FIBRE RICH DIETARY PRODUCT USED FOR THE DIETARY TREATMENT OF ADULT OBESE WOMEN ON BLOOD LIPIDS AND SOME MINERAL LEVELS


Aliye Ozenoglu, PhD:
Department of Psychiatry, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty,
University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Serdal Ugurlu, MD:
Department of Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty,
University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Erkan Caglar, MD:
Department of Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty,
University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Nurhan Caneroglu, MD :
Division of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes and Department of Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Fulya Akin, MD:
Division of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes and Department of Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Gunay Can, MD: Department of Public Health, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty,
University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Hüsrev Hatemi, MD:
Professor of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes and Department of Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence to:
Aliye Özenoglu
Altimermer cad. Miralay Hasan Kazim sok. Ertan Apt. No: 15/2
34280 Kocamustafapasa/Istanbul/ TURKEY
Tel: +90 212 4143130
Fax: +90 212 4143130
E-mail: aliyeozenoglu@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT

Background and aim: Obesity, that can lead to diabetes and dislipidaemia, is a growing health problem of modern life. Unhealthy nutritional habits and consumption of too much refined food are important factors contributing to this condition. This study was performed to search for the effect of a Fibre rich dietary product on blood lipids and some mineral levels, used as a part of dietary treatment of obese adult women.

Methods: A total of 25 adult women (12 in the study group and 13 in the control group) were taken into this study in which patients were selected randomly for both groups. At the beginning of the study, height, weight, waist and hip circumferences of all women were measured, and blood samples were taken for some biochemical parameters (fasting blood glucose, triglicerides, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, and serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, iron and iron binding capacity). Patients having some endocrinologic and metabolic disturbances and that need to use anti-obesity medications were not taken into this study. A low calorie weight loss diet was planned for all women in both groups, but women in the study group were also advised to use a specific dietary product filled with inulin and oligofructose including diabetic chocolate and rich in wheat fibre as an exchange for one slice of bread every day. No specific dietary product was advised to women in control group. Patients were controlled once a month with respect to weight loss and dietary adhesion until 3 months of treatment were completed. Biochemical parameters were repeated at the third month. Statistical analysis was performed by a computer program with Mann-Whitney U and Willcoxon tests.

Results: Although biochemical parameters taken at the beginning of the study didn't show any significant differences between groups, there were significant decreases for trigliceride, total cholesterol and VLDL-C levels in the study group after 3 months of treatment, but not in the control group. No significant differences were found with respect to the mineral levels in either group or between basal and end findings between study and control groups. Women in both groups lost weight, and their waist and hip circumferences decreased significantly.

Conclusion: We concluded that this fibre rich, fat, sugar and salt free dietary product can be useful for the dietary treatment of not only obesity but also dislipidemia and insulin resistant states.

Key words: Obesity, diet, fibre, blood lipids

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a multifactorial disease which is defined as increased fat tissue of the body to above normal levels. It leads to an increase in risk for many diseases some of which are diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and also cancer. Aetiology of obesity includes genetic and environmental factors; unbalanced, especially high in fat diets; overeating; deficiency in physical activty; some disease conditions that cause a decrease in exercise; and also socio-economical status. Since it is impossible to change the genetic factors, the most suitable way for the management of obesity seems to control environmental factors. Nutritional modification according to individual needs and increasing physical activty are the most important environmental factors to be controlled. While technological developments have improved the quality of life, they have caused people to lessen their physical activity as well. On the other hand, increase in the power to buy goods have made people overeat especially preferring 'fast foods' which are high in fat, cholesterol, sodium and energy, but low in fibre, vitamins and minerals. An unavoidable result of this type of lifestyle is obesity and in turn leads to other obesity related chronic diseases. For these reasons, we conducted this study to investigate the effects of a fibre rich, fat, salt and sugar free, dietary product for weight loss and some biochemical parameters used for dietary treatment of obese women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 25 obese women who attend our Endocrinology Department and without any endocrinologic and/or metabolic disturbances over 15 years old, were taken into this study. Twelve subjects (mean age: 34.25±14.77 year) were in the study group and 13 (mean age: 37.51±11.71 year) in the control group. At the beginning of the study blood samples were taken from all subjects for basal fasting blood sugar (FBS), trigliceride (TG), cholesterol, HDL, LDL and VLDL cholesterol and serum calcium (Ca), phosporus (P), iron (Fe) and iron binding capacity (FeBC) levels. Anthropometric measurements including height, weight, waist and hip circumferences, and body composition anlyses with a Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (BIA), were performed by a diet specialist. At least 3 days' food records were taken prepared by each patient to predict their nutritional habits and also indepth interview which is a qualitative method, was performed, taking at least one hour for each patient. After that, low caloric and nutritionally balanced diets were planned for all patients in both groups according to patients nutritional and social conditions. Patients in the study group were advised to intake a special dietary product filled with inulin and oligofructose including diabetic choclate and rich in wheat fibre, but free in fat, sugar and salt, equivalent to the carbohydrate content of one slice of bread (15 g), every day as bread exchange. This amount of fibre rich dietary product (20 g) adds to the patient's diet 5.5 g dietary fibre and 1.0 g cellulose every day. No special dietary product was advised to the patients in the control group.

All patients were seen once a month by either an endocrinologist or dietitian. Patients' weight reduction levels, waist and hip circumferences, and changes in body compositions were measured and than recorded, and their food intake was evaluated as to whether it was suitable to be advised diet or not. Patients who didn't regulary use special dietary products in the bstudy group were excluded from the study. Pharmacological treatment advised patients were not taken into this study. The results were statistically analysed by a computer program with Mann Whitney-U and Willcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Anthropometric measurements of both groups at the beginning and the end of the study are shown in Table 1.

Biochemical parameters taken at the beginning for both groups were compared in Table 2a.

Biochemical parameters taken at the end of the study are shown at Table 2b.
There were significant differences between only serum iron binding capacities of the groups taken at the beginning of the study. After 3 months of treatment, FBG levels showed significant differences between groups.

Findings of the study group taken at the beginning (basal) and the end of the study are shown at Table 3a.

Weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences of women in the study group reduced significantly by the end of the study. Trigliceride, cholesterol ve VLDL cholesterol levels also showed significant decreases. But no significant difference was found in mineral levels.
Findings of the control group belong to basal and the end of the study, are given in Table 3b.
After 3 months of treatment, mean weight and BMI of the control group showed a very significant decrease compared to the basal values. Also, waist and hip circumferences decreased significantly. There were not any significant differences in mineral levels.

DISCUSSION

The affluent western lifestyle is associated with many chronic diseases including diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD) and cancer. The relationship between lack of physical activity, excessive feeding and chronic diseases is well known. The dietary Fibre hypothesis (1,2) has drawn attention to the fact that these diseases are because of a deficiency of dietary fibre. Many studies based on observation have provided data that the consumption of whole-grain cereals have a beneficial role in reducing CHD. In addition, it has been suggested that consuming a lot of whole-grain food reduced the risk of diabetes (3,4), hypertension and some types of cancer (5).

An increase in body weight contributes to the risk of diabetes and CHD in addition to causing insulin resistance. Because of this reason, it is suggested that it would be beneficial for obese subjects to eat fibre. In addition to studies showing a positive effect of water-soluble viscous fibre and low-glycemic index diets on the risk factors of diseases associated with insulin resistance, there are also studies which prove that serum lipids, carbohydrate tolerance and glycemic control improve with insoluble wheat bran (6). In our study, we used a specific dietary product rich in wheat, oat and apple fibre (%28) and filled with diabetic choclate including inulin, isomalt and oligofructose. When some parameters of the groups before and three months after therapy were compared, it was seen that triglyceride (TG), cholesterol and VLDL cholesterol levels decreased significantly after therapy in the study group (Table-3a); no such change was observed in the control group (Table-3b). In both groups, weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences decreased significantly after 3 months (Table-3a,b). Mineral levels didn't show any significant difference in both groups. We thought that inulin and oligofructose which have prebiotic properties, might effect positively for absorption of these minerals.

It is said that when inulin and oligofructose which are non-absorbable carbohydrates, are added to a diet, they cause a significant increase in the colonic bifidobacteria population(7). Inulin and oligofructose are fermented totally by colonic microflora to produce acetat and other short chain fatty acids. Together with dietary fibre and other non-absorbable carbohydrates, they play important roles in decreasing blood cholesterol, postprandial hypoglycaemia, immune stimulation, and vitamin synthesis (7-9). Studies on rats showed that inulin and oligofructose intake to nearly 10% of a diet, cause a decrease in hepatic trigliceride synthesis and serum VLDL levels (10-12).

According to the results of our study which was compatible with the literature, we can say that this dietary product rich-in-fibre and free in fat, salt and sugar might be useful for not only weight reduction diets; but, also in the presence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity. It is also evident that foods rich-in-fibre will help to prevent constipation which is an important problem in subjects of almost all ages from different parts of the community.

As a result of the advances in technology, the consumption of ready to eat refined fast-foods has increased, leading to an increase in the frequency of diseases like obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and cancer. We can say that this fibre-rich dietary product which has a similar constitution to natural foods can be used not only for the treatment of some diseases, but also can be included in healthy nutritional programmes to help prevent chronic degenerative diseases.

Table 1: Comparison of anthropometric measurements of both groups.

Parameter                 Study group                             Control group                          p

                                   Mean               SD                   Mean               SD                             

Age (year)                34.25               14.77               37.31               11.71               0.611

Height (cm)             155.50               6.61                158.08             7.71                 0.503

Weight 1 (kg)              90.83               30.42               96.77               17.41               0.087

Weight 4 (kg)              82.38               28.30               89.19               14.44               0.087

BMI 1 (kg/m2)              37.57               11.38               39.04               8.50                 0.186

BMI 4 (kg/m2)              34.19               10.71               35.99               7.26                 0.137

Waist cir. 1 (cm)          99.92              21.19               104.15             10.41               0.186

Waist cir. 4 (cm)          93.46             22.32                99.15               8.68                 0.077

Hip cir. 1 (cm)            122.83             20.27               127.31             13.67                 0.186

Hip cir. 4 (cm)            117.38             19.56                121.31             11.49               0.186

WHR 1                          0.81                 0.05                 0.82                 0.06                 0.769

WHR 4                          0.79                 0.06                 0.81                 0.05                 0.270

                                                                                                                                            

BMI: Body mass index
WHR: Waist/hip ratio
1: Measures taken at the beginning of the study
4: Measures taken at the end of the study.

Back to text

Table 2a. Comparison of basal biochemical parameters of the groups.

Parameter                    Study group                           Control group

                                    Mean               SD                   Mean               SD                   p         

FBG (mg/dl)                91.92               13.15               97.77               12.14               0.247

Trigliceride (mg/dl)       117.33             30.17               138.46             78.84               0.574

Cholesterol (mg/dl)       213.42             45.31               201.85             29.77               0.503

LDL-C. (mg/dl)              137.17             39.39               126.77             27.43               0.728

HDL-C (mg/dl)               52.66               15.61               46.60               10.02               0.186

VLDL-C. (mg/dl)             23.50               6.12                 28.62               15.77               0.406

Fe (mic/dl)                      74.29               19.14               81.89               36.86               0.837

FeBC (mic/dl)                 342.29             31.83               383.00             31.79               0.031*

Calcium (mg/dl)               10.16               0.53                 9.93                 0.30                 0.383

Phosphorous (mg/dl)       3.90                 0.77                 2.53                 0.39                 0.057

Hemoglobin (g/dl)          12.69                 1.01                 13.24               1.35                 0.232

Hematocrit (%)               36.89               1.62                 38.30               3.61                 0.536  

Back to text

Table 2b: Comparision of biochemical parameters taken after 3 months of the study.

Parametre                    Study group                           Control group

                                    Mean               SD                   Mean               SD                   p         

FBG (mg/dl)                89.50               14.04               100.00             9.97                   0.005**

Trigliserid (mg/dl)        94.25               35.90               135.15             62.89                 0.060

Cholesterol (mg/dl)    191.83             36.13               201.92             30.75                  0.470

LDL -C (mg/dl)           125.83             28.25               131.08             29.49                  0.689

HDL -C (mg/dl)             47.16               8.92                 44.56               11.19               0.406

VLDL-C (mg/dl)            18.93               7.32                 26.38               12.97               0.123

Fe (mic/dl)                 73.63               31.88               63.64               22.51               0.492

FeBC (mic/dl)             321.50             39.14               338.55             44.22                 0.542

Calcium (mg/dl)              9.87                 0.51                 9.81                 0.45                0.852

Phosporus (mg/dl)         3.07                 0.21                 2.60                 0.60                 0.400

Hgb (g/dl)                    12.90               1.09                 12.63               0.94                   0.836

Hct (%)                         37.01               2.91                 36.86               2.17                 0.836  

**: highly significant

Back to text

Table 3a: Comparison of basal and the end findings of the study group.

Parameter                  At the beginning              After 3 months

                                    Mean               SD                   Mean               SD                   p   ______      

Weight (kg)               90.83               30.42               82.38               28.30               0.002**

BMI (kg/m2)               37.57               11.38               34.19               10.71               0.002**

Waist cir. (cm)           99.92               21.19               93.46              22.32              0.002**

Hip cir. (cm)              122.83             20.27               117.38             19.56               0.002**

WHR                             0.81                 0.05                 0.79                0.06               0.066

FBG (mg/dl)                91.92               13.15               89.50               14.04               0.184

Trigliceride (mg/dl)     117.33             30.17               94.25               35.90               0.019*

Cholesterol (mg/dl)     213.43             45.31               191.83             36.13               0.019*

LDL C (mg/dl)             137.17             39.39               125.83             25.25               0.117

HDL -C. (mg/dl)            52.66               15.61               47.16               8.92                 0.062

VLDL-C. (mg/dl)          23.50               6.12                 18.93               7.32                 0.026*

Fe (mic/dl)                   74.29               19.14               73.63               31.88               1.000

FeBC (mic/dl)              342.29             31.83               321.50             39.14               0.138

Calcium (mg/dl)           10.16               0.53                 9.87                 0.51                 0.414

Hgb (g/dl)                    12.69               1.01                 12.90               1.09                 0.588

Hct (%)                       36.89               1.62                 37.01               2.91                 0.500  

Hgb: Hemoglobin

Hct: Hematocrit

Table 3b: Comparision of the findings of control group taken at the beginning and the end of the study.

Parameter                At the beginning                  After 3 months

                                   Mean               SD                   Mean               SD                   p         

Weight (kg)               96.77               17.41               89.19               14.44               0.001***

BMI (kg/m2)               39.04               8.50                 35.99               7.26                 0.001***

Waist cir. (cm)        104.15               10.41               99.15               8.68                 0.002**   

Hip cir. (cm)            127.31               13.67               121.31             11.49               0.002**

WHR                          0.82                 0.06                 0.81                 0.05                 0.843

FBG (mg/dl)              97.77               12.14               100.00             9.97                 0.624

Trigliserid (mg/dl)    138.46              78.84               135.15             62.89               0.972

Cholesterol (mg/dl)  201.85              29.77               201.92             30.75               0.727

LDL -C (mg/dl)         126.77              27.43               131.08             29.49               0.600

HDL -C (mg/dl)        46.60               10.02              44.56               11.19               0.308

VLDL-C. (mg/dl)        28.62               15.77               26.38               12.97               0.583

Fe (mic/dl)                 81.89               36.86               63.64               22.51               0.176

FeBC (mic/dl)           383.00             31.79               338.55             44.22               0.063

Calcium (mg/dl)           9.93                 0.30                9.81                0.45                 1.000

Hgb (g/dl)                  13.24               1.35                 12.63               0.94                 0.593

Hct (%)                      38.30               3.61                 36.82               2.17                 0.715  

Back to text

REFERENCES

  1. Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painte NS: Effects of dietary fibre on stools and the transit times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 2:1408-12, 1972.
  2. Trowell H: Diabetes mellitus and dietary Fibre of starchy foods. Am J Clin Nutr 31: 53-57, 1978.
  3. Salmeron J, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ, Wing AL, Willett WC: Dietary Fibre, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes care 20: 545-50, 1997.
  4. Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC: Dietary Fibre, glycemic load and risk of non-insülin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. J Am Med Assoc 277: 472-77, 1997.
  5. Levi F, Pasche C, LaVecchia C, Lucchini F, Franceschi S: Food groups and colorectal canser risk. British Journal of Cancer 79: 1283-87, 1999.
  6. Bosello O, Ostuzzi R, Armellini F, Micciolo R, Scuro LA: Glucose tolerance and blood lipids in bran-fed patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care 3: 46-49, 1980.
  7. Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Vuksan V: Inulin, oligofructose and intestinal function. J Nutr 129: 1431S-1433S, 1999.
  8. Roberfroid M: Dietary Fibre, Inulin and oligofructose: A review comparing their physiological effects. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 33: 103-48, 1993.
  9. Health implications of dietary Fibre-Position of ADA. J Am Diet Assoc 97:1157-59,1997.
  10. Fiordaliso M, Kok N, Desager JP, Goethals F, Roberfroid M, Delzenne N: Dietary oligofructose lowers triglicerydes, phospholipids cholesterol in serum and very low density lipoproteins of rats. Lipids 30: 163-67, 1995.
  11. Kok N, Roberfroid M, Deizenne N: Dietary oligofructose modifies the impact of fructose on hepatic triacylglycerol metabolism. Metabolism 45: 1547-50, 1996.
  12. Kok N, Roberfroid M, Robert A, Deizenne N: Involment of lipogenesis in the lower VLDL secretion induced by oligofructose in rats. Br J Nutr 7: 881-90, 1996.



Disclaimer
l © Copyright 2007 medi+WORLD International Pty. Ltd.