|
November
2014
- Volume 8, Issue 4
Guidelines
for article publishing
(
|
Lesley Pocock
Correspondence:
Lesley Pocock
Publisher and Managing Director,
medi+WORLD International
World Family Medicine
Middle East Journal of Family Medicine
Middle East Journal of Age and Ageing
Middle East Journal of Business
Middle East Journal of Nursing
Middle East Journal of Internal Medicine
Middle East Journal of Psychiatry & Alzheimers
Email:
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
|
Abstract
With papers from the journals
listed above, now in several major databases and with
the application of unique DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers)
to all individual articles, we are publishing the following
advice and revision of guidelines for our authors. This
advice reflects the current status of academic online
publishing.
Key words: plagiarism,
duplicate publications, DOIs
|
Introduction
Most publishers have adopted
the use of unique DOIs on papers in their online journals.
This facilitates the identification and therefore citation,
of papers. It also allows for a better recognition of plagiarism
and readily identifies duplicate publications on online databases.
The International DOI Foundation (IDF), is a not-for-profit
membership organization that is the governance and management
body for the federation of Registration Agencies providing
DOI services and registration, and is the registration authority
for the ISO standard (ISO 26324) for the DOI system. The DOI
system provides a technical and social infrastructure for
the registration and use of persistent interoperable identifiers,
called DOIs, for use on digital networks. (1)
Publishers pay an annual fee for the allocation of DOIs.
Such a facility provides easier access and identification
of published papers but also has an imperative that each article
be unique and properly indexed.
Most journals have full Author Guidelines and comply with
the COPE Code of Conduct. Visit http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf
for full details.
I follow with a worthy checklist
to better guard against various forms of research misconduct,
from an article originally published in the Middle East Journal
of Family Medicine.
Research
misconduct encompasses a vast array of behaviours, from
very serious research misbehaviour such as data fabrication
to the less serious aspects such as authorship disputes.
It would be possible to categorize very serious misbehaviours
as research fraud and less serious types as questionable
research practices.
From
one hand, evidence suggests that different research
misconduct, either research fraud or questionable research
practices might have substantial damaging impact on
the advancement of human knowledge. On the other hand,
some novice and young researchers might innocently commit
such misconduct. Therefore, the aim of the present article
is to overview diverse types of research misconduct.
Data fabrication and data falsification
Data fabrication means inventing fake data whilst data
falsification implies distorting existing data to obtain
some specific results. Both of these research misbehaviours
are among the most serious research misconduct i.e.
research fraud.
Plagiarism and self-plagiarism
Plagiarism implies stealing other people's ideas and
self-plagiarism means stealing one's own idea both without
providing proper attribution. Plagiarism and self-plagiarism
could start from one sentence and might extend to one
paragraph and even a full article. Plagiarism especially
in larger text copying is categorized as research fraud.
Duplicate publication, redundant publication and
salami publication
Duplicate publication indicates publishing two identical
articles whilst redundant publication involves publication
of two rather similar articles. Salami publication also
denotes publishing two or more articles from a single
study. It should be noted that only large epidemiological
studies might permit publication of more than one article.
Whilst duplicate publication can be categorized as a
serious research misconduct, redundant and salami publication
might be considered as less serious forms.
Failing to gain approval for the research proposal from
an ethics committee for research
Failing to gain approval for the research proposal from
an ethics committee for research could be regarded as
a serious type of research misconduct. This gets worse
when the proposal deals with interventional design in
human subjects such as in clinical trials. Therefore,
it is highly suggested that any research proposal should
receive approval from an ethics committee for research.
Conducting research in humans and/or animals without
considering ethical issues
Approval for the research proposal from an ethics committee
for research is a necessary but not sufficient step
for avoiding research misconduct. In addition, researchers
should take into account any relevant ethical approved
guidelines when dealing with humans and/or animals subjects.
Failing to consider such ethical issues could be regarded
as serious types of research misconduct.
Ignoring outliers, ignoring missing data, reporting
post-hoc analyses without declaring them.
Any wrong doings in the process of data analyses such
as ignoring outliers, ignoring missing data, reporting
post-hoc analyses without declaring them, could have
serious impacts on the results. Therefore, it is necessary
that researchers admit and declare any outliers and/or
missing data. Furthermore, carrying out any type of
post-hoc analyses should be declared in advance by the
researchers.
Authorship disputes
Authorship disputes encompass any disagreements between
researchers about the names and orders of the authors
in a given paper. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that
such questionable research practice is rather common
in different countries around the world. Therefore,
it is up to authors to consider the authorship criteria
in order to name in the right order only true authors
and avoiding guest or ghost authorships.
Failing to disclose a conflict of interest
Conflict of interest implies that researchers, reviewers
and editors have a relationship either financial and/or
non-financial to a person, school of thought, organization;
etc that might cause unwanted impacts on the process
of scientific publication. The most important way to
avoid any research misconduct regarding conflict of
interest is to disclose any possible conflicts before
publishing a paper.
Failure to carry out a thorough literature review
before commencing new research
Failure to carry out a thorough literature review before
commencing new research is judged to be a questionable
research practice. The reason for this is too obvious,
since inadequate literature review might lead to flawed
or repetitive research. (2)
|
References
(1) www.doi.org
(2) Rezaeian M; A review on the diverse types of research
misconduct, Middle East Journal of Family Medicine, Volume
12, Issue 7, September 2014
|
 |